![]() ![]() Sources and output directory: Same operation as Sources option above, plus: Deletes and recreates $(Build.BinariesDirectory). More specifically, the following Git commands are executed prior to fetching the source. Sources: The build pipeline performs an undo of any changes in $(Build.SourcesDirectory). YAML Pipelines are supported in Azure DevOps Server 2019 and higher. ![]() parameters:īy default, clean is set to true but can be overridden when manually running the pipeline by unchecking the Checkout clean checkbox that is added for the runtime parameter. In the following example, a runtime parameter is used to configure the checkout clean setting. To override clean settings when manually running a pipeline, you can use runtime parameters. Select YAML, Get sources, and configure your desired Clean setting. To configure the Clean setting:Įdit your pipeline, choose. The pipeline settings UI has a Clean setting, that when set to true is equivalent of specifying clean: true for every checkout step in your pipeline.The workspace setting for job has multiple clean options (outputs, resources, all).When set to true, the pipeline runs execute git clean -ffdx & git reset -hard HEAD before fetching the repo. There are several different clean options available for YAML pipelines. If you do need to clean the repo (for example to avoid problems caused by residual files from a previous build), your options are below.Īzure Pipelines, Azure DevOps Server 2019 and newer In this case, to get the best performance, make sure you're also building incrementally by disabling any Clean option of the task or tool you're using to build. In general, for faster performance of your self-hosted agents, don't clean the repo. You can perform different forms of cleaning the working directory of your self-hosted agent before a build runs. Usually you'll set this to be the same as the default branch of the repository (for example, "master"). The default branch has no bearing when the build is triggered through continuous integration (CI). If you set a scheduled trigger for the build, this is the branch from which your build will get the latest sources. This is the branch that you want to be the default when you manually queue this build. This answer describes how to restore it after cloning such repository.Click Advanced settings in the Get Sources task to see some of the above options. ![]() git folder of a wiki repository won't be included into your main repository. This is only a one-time issue, any future files can be added as usual. git folder for a while (otherwise Git will add it as a submodule): mv wiki/.git/ wiki/.git_/ & git add wiki/* & mv wiki/.git_/ wiki/.git/ To add a contents of an existing repository into another repository you'll need to remove the. This method kind of combines the pros of submodules and subtrees suggested in other answers, but it doesn't complicate the workflow much: it allows you to have wiki files in your main repository, see them in pull requests and easily push them to or pull from the wiki. You could place a copy of a wiki repository into your main repository and work with them in parallel: git init It also makes it trivially simple to ship documentation with your code instead of assuming people will just read it online. Another solution to fix this would be to do a filter-branch and a regular merge, one time, to keep history.įor me, the main advantage of having the wiki as part of the main source tree is that pull requests and changes can be coordinated across code and documentation. This is a known limitation related to git subtrees. The history is there, but somehow git-log fails to track it. Unfortunately, merging changes the other way is somewhat trickier, and anyways, you should probably do this as a one time thing, then close the wiki, or redirect to the repo source.įurthermore, a major caveat of this approach is that git log wiki/Home.md (for example) doesn't actually show the history from the wiki page. To merge the new changes in after review, you would do: git pull -s subtree wiki master You can even keep the wiki working on the side to welcome public contributions there, but then vet them into your main documentation as you see fit. Git commit -m "Github wiki subtree merged in wiki/" Git read-tree -prefix=wiki/ -u wiki/master Git merge -s ours -no-commit -allow-unrelated wiki/master Git remote add -f wiki git:///you/proj.wiki Then to merge it in your main repository, you would do: git clone git:///you/proj For example, assuming your repository is you/proj, your wiki would be at: git:///you/proj.wiki. Nevertheless, I believe the best solution is to simply move the wiki into the main repository, say in docs/ or wiki, using a subtree merge. In my opinion, GitHub wikis should be branches of the main repository, or at least it should be possible to make that an option. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |